FILMMAKER BLOG Load & Play RSS Feed

Monday, June 07, 2004
RONALD REAGAN: THE MOVIE 

With the passing of Ronald Reagan this weekend the airwaves are quickly becoming saturated with programs summarizing his long career as both an actor and politician -- but none are likely to examine the intersection of the two as effectively as Michael Rogin did in his groundbreaking 1987 essay "Ronald Reagan -- The Movie" (Radical History Review, No. 38), which was republished as Chapter 1 of his book Ronald Reagan, the Movie: and Other Episodes in Political Demonology, about the countersubversive tradition in America.

In his essay, Rogin writes, "'Movies Are Forever,' was the theme of the 1981 Academy Awards. President Ronald Reagan, the first Hollywood actor elevated to the Presidency, was scheduled to welcome the Academy from the White House. 'Film is forever,' the President was to tell the Academy. 'It is the motion picture that tells us not only how we look and sound -- but more important[ly] -- how we feel.' Hollywood movies, Reagan was suggesting, mirror back to us the feelings we see on the screen as if they were our own. As if to confirm the President's faith in the power of film, John W. Hinckley, Jr., imitiating the plot of Taxi Driver, deliberately shot the President on the day of the Academy Awards.

"Millions of Americans experienced the assassination attempt by watching it over and over again on TV. The power of the image to confirm the shooting also allowed Reagan to speak to the Academy the next night as if it had never happened. The television audience watching their screens saw a Hollywood audience watching another screen. One audience saw the other applaud a taped image of a healthy Reagan, while the real President lay in a hospital bed. Reagan was President because of film, hospitalized because of film, and present as image because of film. The shooting climaxed the film's ingestion of reality. In doing so it culminated, in an uncanny way, Reagan's personal project: the creation of a disembodied self that, by rising above real inner conflicts, would reflect back to the President and all the rest of us not only how he looked and sounded but -- more importantly -- how he felt and who he was."

Douglas Kellner picks up on Rogin's thesis in his essay "Presidential Politics: The Movie", which he summarizes as follows: "One can depict the relationship between media and politics from the Kennedy administration to Bush II in terms of the narrative and cinematic spectacle that framed the respective presidency. From this perspective, successful presidencies presented good movies that succeeded in being effective and entertaining in selling a presidency to the public. Failed presidencies, by contrast, can be characterized as bad movies that fashioned a negative public image that bombed with the public and left behind disparaging or indifferent images and reviews of the presidency in question...

"The Reagan Administration was one of the most successful media presidencies and set of political spectacles in history. Michael Rogin has written a book Ronald Reagan, The Movie... that documents the intersection of Reagan's film and political career. Reagan, contrary to some popular misrepresentations, was a top-line A and not B-movie actor. His presidency was scripted to act out and play his presidential role. Reagan rehearsed his lines everyday and generally gave a good performance. Every move was scripted and his media handlers had camera on hand to provide the image, photo opportunity, and political line of the day that they wanted to convey to the media...

"The centrality of media spectacle and political narrative to contemporary politics means that making sense of the current era requires the tools of a critical social theory and cultural studies in order to analyze the images, discourses, events, and narratives of presidential politics. Of course, politics is more than merely narrative, there are real events with material interests and consequences, and often behind the scenes maneuvering that are not part of the public record. Yet publics see presidencies and administrations in terms of narrative and spectacle, so that theorizing the cinematic and narrative nature of contemporary politics can help us understand, critique and transform our political system."


# posted by Steve Gallagher @ 6/07/2004 12:48:00 PM
Comments (1)

 
If A good movie is ever done, Tim Matheson should play President Reagan.
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 6/16/2008 9:33 PM  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



RECENT POSTS

COLOR ME CYAN
FROM A TOY
THE YES MEN
DRIVE-IN MOVIES AT ROCKEFELLER CENTER
BRUCE LaBLOG
FAHRENHEIT RISING
SHAKIN' IT WITH TARKOVSKY
MENTORS & PROTEGES
REGARDING THE TORTURE OF OTHERS
GLOBAL FILM INITIATIVE PARTNERS WITH FIRST RUN FEA...


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010