FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Wednesday, June 07, 2006
TOO MUCH FAITH 

Cinematic sinners are accustomed to squawking when the MPAA threatens an NC-17 on a guns-blazing, sex-filled entertainment. But Matt Drudge links today to a report from the Scripps Howard News Service which describes a complaint by a group of Christian moviemakers behind a movied called Facing the Giants who say that the MPAA has given them a PG rating (instead of a G) because their film is "too evangelistic."

From the piece:

The MPAA, noted [Provident Films v.p. of marketing Kris] Fuhr, tends to offer cryptic explanations for its ratings. In this case, she was told that it "decided that the movie was heavily laden with messages from one religion and that this might offend people from other religions. It's important that they used the word 'proselytizing' when they talked about giving this movie a PG. ...

"It is kind of interesting that faith has joined that list of deadly sins that the MPAA board wants to warn parents to worry about."

Overt Christian messages are woven throughout "Facing the Giants," which isn't surprising since the film was co-written and co-produced by brothers Alex and Stephen Kendrick, who are the "associate pastors of media" at Sherwood Baptist Church in Albany, Ga. In addition to working with the megachurch's cable-television channel, they created its Sherwood Pictures ministry _ collecting private donations to fund a $25,000 movie called "Flywheel," about a wayward Christian used-car salesman.

"Facing the Giants" cost $100,000 and resembles a fusion of the Book of Job and a homemade "Hoosiers," or perhaps a small- school "Friday Night Lights" blended with the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association movies that used to appear in some mainstream theaters. Sherwood Pictures used local volunteers as actors and extras, backed by a small crew of tech professionals.

The movie includes waves of answered prayers, a medical miracle, a mysterious silver-haired mystic who delivers a message from God and a bench-warmer who kicks a 51-yard field goal to win the big game when his handicapped father pulls himself out of a wheelchair and stands under the goal post to inspire his son's faith.


Bookmark and Share
# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 6/07/2006 01:26:00 PM
Comments (6)

 
I think it is unfortunate that a movie teaching morals and character is seen as inappropriate. What about all the sex and violent filled films? Shouldn't those be the films that need parental guidance?
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 6/09/2006 10:43 AM  

 
Look at the problems our society has now and ask why? This is a perfect example of how a country built on religion and faith can get transformed and fall. I feel terrible about the battles that all children will face in the next 50 yrs. if we as parents dont stand up NOW for what is right. This is a film that any parent should encourage their children to watch. Why are people so afraid to stand up for something that will only bring "good"? "MJM"
# posted by Anonymous M. Jason Mercer @ 6/10/2006 3:29 PM  

 
I've already received a forwarded email about this which made it sound like a general onslaught on faith/Christianity is being waged by the MPAA. Is it only this particular film that has received a rating based on those considerations?
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 6/10/2006 10:21 PM  

 
Well, I should say a few things. I thought this was an interesting article to link to because independent filmmakers often tangle with the MPAA when adult issues are dealt with in serious ways. The filmmakers often have to cut their films in order not to receive an "NC-17" rating, which more or less dooms a film commercially. Given this, it is interesting and ironic that a group of Christian moviemakers are complaining about an MPAA rating being given to a film on the basis of a religious dialogue.

That being said, I think everyone should note that the rating being discussed here is a PG rating, which doesn't restrict anybody from seeing the film and doesn't dissuade any theater from showing it. The filmmakers wanted a G, apparently, and didn't get one, but I can't believe it's going to hurt their film. In fact, like indie filmmakers who often use an unfavorable MPAA rating to publicize their film, I wouldn't be surprised if these filmmakers aren't doing the same thing. More people know about the film now and the rating won't stop anyone from seeing it.
# posted by Blogger Scott Macaulay @ 6/11/2006 3:58 PM  

 
The film "Facing the Giants" deals with issues including depression, pregnancy, and sports violence. Given these themes, a PG rating is entirely appropriate. The MPAA has denied statements that the rating was related to Christian themes, including the above quote. This story is an example of Christian paranoia, not MPAA mis-behavior.
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 6/21/2006 3:19 PM  

 
The film wasn't rated PG because it wasn't wholesome movie. It's just that any film that has a strong thematic element whether it is religion or other get's a PG rating. It's not a negative rating. It's a system that has been in affect for years. The filmmakers are just trying to get free press at the MPAA's cost. Now is that very Christian to trash the MPAA???
# posted by Blogger alamuchy @ 6/23/2006 11:27 AM  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2009

RECENT POSTS

HE'S JUST SOUPER!
THE FIVE STAGES OF GLOBAL WARMING
DEMONIC DIRECTING
BRIGHT PICTURES
ADVANCE COPY
GREY AREAS
"COULDN'T YOU HAVE USED RWANDA?"
THOU SHALT EDIT
COMFORTABLE CONVERSATION
SELECTED AMBIENT WORKS


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009


blog | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact
© 2009 Filmmaker Magazine