NYU TischAsia
FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Tuesday, September 05, 2006
WIDESCREEN BLUES 

I've vowed not to link to James Ponsoldt's blog too much since I produced his feature Off the Black, but he's a prolific writer who is frequently posting pieces that are interesting and useful enough to other filmmakers. So, here I'm busting my conflict-of-interest self-censorship to note his comments on shrinking Tim Orr's widescreen compositions to 1:1.35 for our video transfer:

On Tim's off-days, he and I met at Technicolor to begin the color-timing process (for video/DVD) with the brilliant MIKE UNDERWOOD. Mike's a colorist, and worked with Tim on both "All the Real Girls" and "Undertow." The two of them have a short-hand and trust between each other, and that's invaluable when you're paying by the hour.

The way the timing worked was like this: in a suite at Technicolor, the three of us watched each scene of the film, and discussed the look of every shot--whether it was too dim, too green, too bright, not warm enough, etc. Then, when Tim had seen the entire film and given extensive notes, he went back to the set of "Year of the Dog." And then it was just Mike and I.... The color-timing process was slow, but actually seemed like "movie magic." I know that sounds geeky, but it really felt that way. We were creating something beautiful with fun tools, and there's something a bit scientific--but also a bit magical--to the way it works.

Now, the pan and scan process wasn't nearly as pleasurable. I sort of wished I had some morphine for that part.

Here's a simple explanation of a pan and scan, as it related to "Off the Black":

We shot our film in anamorphic 35mm (a 2.35:1 aspect ratio). That means gorgeous wide-screen, perfect for movie theaters...when you see it you feel like you're having a slightly epic experience, perhaps dreamlike, certainly different than everyday life.

But...when the DVD of the film comes out, it will offer several options: one will be be letter-boxed, and that's the ONLY way a film should be watched at home. If you're not watching that version, you're not seeing what the director/cinematographer intended.

Unfortunately, many people don't get to see a film like that.

They see it on a plane, a bus, or most likely, on cable television. The aspect ration for television is 1.33:1 or, as it's often referred to, 4:3. Which mean, in a nutshell, if you watch at 2.35:1 film on television in a 4:3 format, you're LOSING ABOUT 45 PERCENT OF THE IMAGE!

That's incredible. It's a completely different film...


James goes on to describe that process of making a "completely different film" in the piece linked to above.


# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 9/05/2006 01:43:00 AM
Comments (0)


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2008

RECENT POSTS

THE LONGTAIL APPROACHES
SCARLETT FEVER
BLOGGING TORONTO
SECOND DATES
DRIFTING
BLOG ROUNDUP
HOME IS WHERE THE HEART IS
SLOW TRAIN COMING
TONI, TONI, TONI
HOLDING DOWN THE FORT


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008

back to top
home page | archives | blog | resources | fest circuit | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | digital sample | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact

© 2008 Filmmaker Magazine