FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Monday, March 26, 2007
SCARY TIMES 

In a LA Times.com interview, horror master Wes Craven talks with Deborah Netburn on the politics of horror. The political slant of his new remake of The Hills Have Eyes 2 is almost too obvious for comment. The all-American family of his 1977 original The Hills Have Eyes and its 2006 remake –- and the bikers in his slap-dash 1985 The Hills Have Eyes 2 – have been replaced by National Guard trainees, who ultimately will be deployed in Iraq. (Of course, the family in the original may be too close for Craven, since he wrote this remake with his son Jonathan.)

Latimes.com: You have an amazing legacy of figuring out exactly what people are scared of at a given moment in time. What do you think is scary today?
WC:
The current administration. That's the standard answer now. Unfortunately I'm not even joking. But the basic themes of what is scary have always been the same. A murderous rage that builds up in a family, a neighborhood or a nation, those are things I think are scary.


Bookmark and Share
# posted by Peter Bowen @ 3/26/2007 07:50:00 AM
Comments (2)

 
this was a horrific movie!
it had bad acting.
bad filming.
bad script.
there was no plot.
and they just showed graphic rape scenes the entire time.
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 3/26/2007 11:08 AM  

 
i think that this so great horror...but i like it beyond after all what say eweryone :)
# posted by Blogger Robo @ 10/29/2008 8:14 PM  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2009

Fall 2009 Cover

RECENT POSTS

VERHOEVEN FROM ACROSS THE COUCH
BROWN BAGGING IT
DON'T JUDGE THE MOVIE BY ITS POSTER
MORE GRINDHOUSE
OUTLANDISH EMPIRE
GRINDHOUSE UPDATE
SUNSHINE IN THE FALL
HOMETOWN BAGHDAD
WE'RE NOT DRUG DEALERS
THE SILVERBERG SHELVES


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009


blog | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact
© 2009 Filmmaker Magazine