National University
FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Wednesday, April 11, 2007
GOOD GOD! 


After the divine profits of Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, whose distribution rollout was shepherded by Indie guru Bob Berney, Christian films have been on the ascension. Last week in Variety, Gregory Ellwood's article "Independent Focus on Faith Films" surveyed the rise of Christian production companies, each which uses the American independent film model to spread the Good Word. And each company has carved out a particular genre and/or market for its faith-based work. Namesake, says CEO Joe Goodman, makes "films that are more in the thriller/horror genre that may have a spiritual theme." Coming up for fall House, a horror film about an un-holy ghost. For Codeblack, on the hand, according to CEO Jeff Clanagan, "our movies under our faith-based banner have a very specific target marketing to the African-American gospel market,"

Christian spirit has now spread to the internet with the establishment of GodTube, a evangelical version of YouTube. As in a parallel universe, GodTube has the same shaky camera, bad singing, and juvenile parodies as its predecessor -- only this time with a message. Check out the Christian (mostl white) rewind of Sir Mix-A-Lot's infamous song "Baby Got Back." Here it is book, not back, that baby's got.


# posted by Peter Bowen @ 4/11/2007 07:24:00 AM
Comments (8)

 
I still think the only film about faith that should be shown around the country is Bad Lieutenant.
# posted by William @ 4/11/2007 8:16 AM  

 
Why does the GodTube player look like HAL9000?...
# posted by Anonymous @ 4/11/2007 1:02 PM  

 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
— The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

What part of "the free exercise thereof;" doesn't the anti-Christian bigot get?
# posted by LiveFreeOrDie @ 4/11/2007 8:02 PM  

 
"What part of "the free exercise thereof;" doesn't the anti-Christian bigot get?"

The part that goes: "...or abridging the freedom of speech..."

The Christian has every right to express himself, as does the rational secularist.
# posted by Anonymous @ 4/11/2007 10:02 PM  

 
A gentle reminder to the "rational secularists" among us that the semi-colon following "the free exercise of religion" is a furtherance of the idea that the free exercise of religion includes freedom of religious speech. Certainly the framers of the constitution did not have in mind the protection of the profane and the seditious. Keep in mind that history and common sense repeatedly prove that in those places where "rational secularists" rule and the belief that the power of the secular state supercedes faith you will surely find the mass graves of those who's only crime was the utterance of the words, "I believe in a higher power than the state." Just a reality check for you.
# posted by LiveFreeOrDie @ 4/11/2007 10:28 PM  

 
So it was the rational secularists who performed the Crusades? Or performed ethnic cleansing in Kosovo? Or rammed jets into the World Trade Center?

I'm not sure what you find profane in the discussion taking place here, so that's a bit like trying to cross-examine a witness when the direct questioning never brought the subject up.

The Constitution is not a religious document. It is not the word of God. It was a compromised draft written by the best minds of their time -- over 200 years ago. Written by men who were denying the ordained crown of England. They didn't have electricity. Didn't have combustible engines. Nuclear weapons. Evolution. Penicillin. Life expectancy was 35. It was a well-intentioned document of its time.

And it gives you the right to practice your religion, as it gives others the right to not believe in it. No more, no less.

God Bless Kurt Vonnegut.
# posted by Anonymous @ 4/12/2007 1:42 AM  

 
The bottom line here is that while initially sort of amusing as a novelty, basically this video was pretty boring.

Also I find it interesting that the people who made this video, and also, we must assume, the people who are the target audience for the video, think that non-fundamentalist Christians go around putting down religious people. I personally have never experienced such a thing except, I must confess, coming from fundamentalist Christians themselves. It's sad that they want to exploit some kind of self perceived victimhood. To quote the bard: "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
# posted by Anonymous @ 4/12/2007 4:07 AM  

 
this video is awesome....the woman doing the intro to the song is a superstah! as for the debate over freedom of religion, expression,etc., what the hell does this have to do with godtube? the site is presumably not run by the govt. so the whole thing is a non-starter.
# posted by Anonymous @ 4/12/2007 1:29 PM  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



SPRING 2008

RECENT POSTS

YOU DON'T KNOW JACK
RAY TAKES DISTRIBUTION POST AT SIDNEY KIMMEL
ASPEN SHORTSFEST REPORT
SUPERMARKET SWEET
TRIBECA'S GREEN SCREEN
THAT DARJEELING FEELING
LITTLE BODIES
AFTER DARK HORROR FEST
WERNER HERZOG: NO DAWN YET, BUT PLENTY OF DARKNESS...
CLEAR AS MUD


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007

back to top
home page | archives | blog | resources | fest circuit | order form | subscribe | advertise | contact

© 2008 Filmmaker Magazine