NYU TischAsia
FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Saturday, June 16, 2007
THE TRIAL OF JT LEROY 

Metafiction collided with the law in a New York court this week as Antidote Films, the production company of producer Jeff Levy-Hinte (Thirteen, Laurel Canyon), sued Laura Albert, the woman behind the fictitious author JT Leroy and the novel Sarah, for fraud.

Reports Alan Feuer in The New York Times:

This intricate game of hide-and-seek with its interlocking issues of identity, fame, money and the healing power of art has now leapt from the media to what is arguably the culture’s second most obsessive arena: the courts. A film production company has sued Ms. Albert for fraud, saying that a contract signed with JT Leroy to make a feature film of Sarah should be null and void, for the simple reason that JT Leroy does not exist.


Feuer references O. Henry, George Eliot, Charlotte Bronte and the team of Spike Jonze and Charlie Kaufman in discussing the intricate issues surrounding authorship and the relationship of the author to a work. With regards to Sarah, Antidote's argument is that Leroy's "true-life" backstory involving a childhood spent working at truck stops as a child prostitute, was integral to the book's value.

Feuer, again:

As movie people say, the “inciting incident” of the lawsuit came with the publication in late 2005 of an article in New York magazine that questioned JT Leroy’s identity. The Times followed with an article in February that identified Ms. Albert as the true author of Sarah.

The producers at Antidote were stunned; they were also worried that the commercial prospects of their project might crumble. As Mr. Curtner put it: “The whole autobiographical back story aura that made this so attractive was a sham.”

Mr. Weinstein told the jury that the contract with Antidote was for a book, not a back story, and that the film company could have made the movie no matter who wrote the novel. He then went on to suggest that the project was in freefall (a bad screenplay) and that Antidote had used the excuse of disputed authorship as an escape hatch.


Read Feuer's piece for more of the arguments on both sides.


# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 6/16/2007 03:26:00 PM
Comments (0)


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2008

RECENT POSTS

BLOOD ON THE TRACKS
BOURNE SEPARATED AT BIRTH?
IFC CENTER EVENTS
IN DREAMS
INTO THE BLACK
TEN FILMS STILL NOT ON DVD
BROOKLYN FILM FEST WINNERS
IFP UNVEILS ROUGH CUT LAB SELECTIONS
PUTTING THE 'SHAKE INTO CHICAGO
SHOOTING FROM THE LIP


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008

back to top
home page | archives | blog | resources | fest circuit | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | digital sample | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact

© 2008 Filmmaker Magazine