Wednesday, September 12, 2007TORONTO: HAYNES, MADDIN, DE PALMA AND THE BATTLE FOR TRUTH![]() What was reassuring at Monday night’s Fortissimo Films party and Tuesday night’s Rotterdam reception was the presence of movie directors from nations of relatively small population or stunted economic development who are not even blips on the radar of the U.S. publicity divisions and agencies that steamroll through the Toronto festival. I had lively conversations with filmmakers from countries such as the Philippines and Australia. The access to most American and other First World directors is mediated by the marketeers. Everyone loses. Anyone for symbiotic nurture? My interview with Todd Haynes this afternoon, set up as it was by the p.r. people at the Weinstein Company, was, however, totally satisfying (and will be in print later). The Portland-based director has always been a lovely, smart, and cheerful guy, someone I’ve known since the early ‘80s. I had just come out of a packed press/industry screening of I’m Not There [pictured above], his new Bob Dylan collage that had shared the Special Jury Prize in Venice. (Rant: A lot of industry, or “product,” people work their Blackberrys, lights aglow, during the projections. Is this a way for reviewers, or any cinephile, to see films? Separate screenings, please. Press and industry appear to have different priorities.) As a rule, I do not set up interviews until after I have seen a film—it’s a disservice to the filmmaker and to me—but with Haynes, I felt it worth the gamble. And it was. I’m Not There is brilliant, a visual and aural feast that is so complex in structure that it boggles the mind that he or anyone else could stitch it together. He interweaves six actors portraying various personas of the mutable singer and cultural icon in a nonlinear fashion, integrating as well the music of Dylan and a few others. And he places it all in the very real context of the American socio-political situation in the ‘60s and ‘70s, using both archival and recreated footage. The personal and the political are not separate. The six actors, including a black youth and a woman, are vehicles in an approach that deploys artifice to attempt some understanding about the enigmatic singer. (There are, of course, sequences that are more “realistic.”) Images are magnified on walls, text suddenly flashes on the screen, circus and other performers appear out of nowhere. Sure, Haynes was enamored of artifice in Superstar, Poison, Velvet Goldmine, and Far From Heaven, but he amplifies the strategy here. Todd Solondz’s Palindromes was unsuccessful in its use of multiple actors for a single character, but Haynes’s gamble pays off. He also includes some fabulous fantasy sequences. This is Far From Naturalism. Variety stupidly deemed it something only for Dylan fans. So much for the trades. The other great film here that eschews realism is Guy Maddin’s My Winnipeg. Produced by Canada’s Documentary Channel, it is outrageous, illogical, hilarious, and imaginative, in short, Maddin in top form. Though it purports to be a doc about his home town, the film is really an exercise in fantasy stream-of-consciousness. Winnipeg becomes a hotbed of myth and scandal rooted in the past, not to mention the setting for Maddin’s own primal dilemmas. While his surrogate character is making a movie, trying “to film my way out of Winnipeg,” we get scenes of his overbearing mother and his siblings that are never far from his take on the city itself. Here the personal and the historical are inextricably linked. Haynes and Maddin understand that the fake can be truer than verite. Brian de Palma does not. In the superslick Redacted, he creates a faux-documentary about the U.S. military in Iraq, zeroing in on the notorious rape and murder of a 15-year-old Iraqi girl and some of her relatives in Samarra by some horny, vindictive soldiers. I do not doubt the director’s sincerity, but none of the footage comes close in impact to the multiple fine real docs shot by brave docmakers with strong conviction in actual battle zones. De Palma’s actors—at checkpoints, in barracks, overdo it: This feels like a bad middle-school audio-visual film about venereal disease or the value of homework. What really pisses me off is the depiction of the two main transgressors as semi-insane oddballs. The only honest depiction in the film is the sequence of actual war photos that serves as a coda. Redacted shared the Venice prize with I’m Not There. So much for the validity of juries. Comments (0) |
TORONTO: McCARTHY, KORMAKUR STRIKE GOLD
RYAN IS FETED
GOOD FILMS, QUESTIONABLE AWARDS
BOOKMARKING THE WORLD
SHOCK AND AWE
TORONTO: SEX IN THE CITY
TORONTO: OPENERS AND THEIR EXTENDED FAMILY
REPO! THE GENETIC OPERA
IFP MARKET TIPS
BART WALKER HEADS TO CINETIC
Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010