FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Monday, October 29, 2007
THOSE AMAZING DUTCH! 

Steve Buscemi's Interview, which Filmmaker featured on its cover last issue, opened in London this week and there's been some U.K. press about the movie and its American shoot. And while I don't consider myself a reflexive stars-and-stripes-forever rah-rah'er, I found the comments in this Guardian piece entitled "The Final Cut" by the slain Dutch director Theo Van Gogh's "creative consultant" Doesjka van Hoogdalem about shooting in American both naive and annoying. Much of the piece is devoted to van Hoogdalem's wide-eyed wonder at the wacky wastefulness of U.S. filmmaking.

From the piece:

However, maintaining the authenticity of the Van Gogh style was only possible because producers Weiss and Van de Westelaken were able to bring Van Gogh's Dutch crew to the US. "We had a good lawyer who managed to persuade the US authorities that only the Dutch team could make this film," says Van Hoogdalem.

They had a stiff battle with the unions, who refused to accept the Dutch side's insistence that only a few people were needed - or desired - on set. Van Hoogdalem herself acted as both director's assistant and script adviser until the unions protested that she was doing someone out of a job, at which point the role of "creative consultant" was invented for her.

"We had to fight with them constantly about everything, from taking lunch breaks at a specific time, even when we were in the middle of a scene, to the number of people we had on set at any one time," she says. There were rows over everything from gaffer tape - with the Americans wanting to hire a gaffer-tape lorry when a single piece of tape was required - to the suggestion that a "loop group" from the Screen Actors Guild be hired at a cost of $5,000 a day to produce the background muttering sounds of a restaurant crowd. When Van de Westelaken suggested sticking a microphone in a real restaurant and recording the sound, the Americans on the crew "were amazed, and didn't believe it could be done," he says. "We said, 'We do it like this all the time.' In the end, they came to love our way of working."


Um, yeah, if you shoot a union film in the U.S., there are labor rules. You might want to check them out before you come here. The crew does eat every six hours. People have specific jobs. Yes, it is a way of working. And I wouldn't listen to whoever said you can't record wild sound in a restaurant. In fact, I'll give Van Hoogdalem a tip for the next trip to the U.S. -- email me and I'll hook you up with a sound FX guy who already has these sounds on a CD.


Bookmark and Share
# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 10/29/2007 11:47:00 PM
Comments (1)

 
A country that is staunchly PC? Bizarre.
It is always interesting how film directors et al. can think it is okay to work others like dogs because it is for 'art.' We all need to eat.
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 11/01/2007 8:24 PM  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2009

Fall 2009 Cover

RECENT POSTS

NYC FILM OFFICE ISSUES NEW PROPOSED SHOOTING RULES...
BICYCLING AT NIGHT
WHO IS PABLO?
LEE JUN KI ASSAULT SQUAD AT HIFF 2007
SILENT MOVIE THEATRE
DOWNLOADABLE BURNS
SAN LUIS OBISPO FEST DEADLINE APPROACHING
COOL SITES
SIDNEY LUMET AND CINEMA'S CORPSE
STOP-LOSS TRAILER ONLINE


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009


blog | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact
© 2009 Filmmaker Magazine