AFI Fest 2009
FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Tuesday, November 13, 2007
FOLLOW THE MONEY 

At her Deadline Hollywood Daily, Nikke Finke says "everyone in Hollywood is talking about" this YouTube video put together by the folks at United Hollywood.


Bookmark and Share
# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 11/13/2007 12:21:00 AM
Comments (5)

 
If you look at the list of struck companies, it's surprising how many companies are not on the list. Pretty much all the Indie companies in NY are off that list. Even a surprising number on LA companies that I thought had studio deals aren't on the list. I would think that means that if you are not in the WGA, you could still work freely for any of these companies, if they chose to do business with you and it wouldn't be scabbing, or strike-breaking, or anything bad at all. The WGA is NOT striking these companies! When the unions strike Ford, they don't get mad when workers go to work at GM.

Here's the list of struck companies, which I recommend no one work for during the strike, and which, if you're not in the union, probably won't look at your stuff anyway.

http://wga.org/subpage_member.aspx?id=2537
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 11/13/2007 8:07 AM  

 
This is my understanding as well, but I'm going to try and write something more about non-guild work during the strike at some point.

Most producers set up single-purpose companies to produce a film and that company becomes the guild signatory if the writer doing the work is a member of the guild. So, an indie company might have another entity doing their guild jobs.

The WGA strike is about WGA writers striking guild signatory companies. Many if not most indie film scripts are written by non-guild writers, people who, in many cases, aren't even eligible to join the union. And they sell these scripts to companies that are not guild signatories themselves. The strike really should have nothing to do with them.
# posted by Blogger Scott Macaulay @ 11/13/2007 9:33 AM  

 
Technically speaking though, guild writers are not supposed to do business w/ companies that aren't signatories, right?
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 11/13/2007 2:04 PM  

 
That's right. I was referring in the previous post to non-guild writers and their dealings with non-guild signatory companies.
# posted by Blogger Scott Macaulay @ 11/13/2007 4:56 PM  

 
Now I understand why people were saying this would be good for independent film...
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous @ 11/13/2007 10:41 PM  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2009

RECENT POSTS

HOLLYWOOD 3.0
WHAT'S IN A WORD?
THE JUNOVERSE
ANOTHER WORLD
TRACEY IN SO MANY DIFFERENT WAYS
GROSS OUT!
AFI FEST INDIE FILMS SEEK TRACTION
ROUGH CUT LAB GROUP BLOG
PORN IN THE FOX HOUSE
CAREERS IN ENTERTAINMENT


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009


blog | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact
© 2009 Filmmaker Magazine