AFI Fest 2009
FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Friday, April 11, 2008
THREE SHOTS 


Over at Stream, Jamie Stuart has a nice piece up in which he looks at the three most important Hollywood movies of the year -- No Country for Old Men, Zodiac and There Will Be Blood -- and discusses the very different ways they went about creating their images.

An excerpt:

The fact that all three of these pictures used technologies in different a manner is ultimately irrelevant to the fact that they are all stories told with pictures, regardless of the chosen workflow. While they may be aesthetically different, each approach is completely legitimate. One similarity between them is a screen aspect ratio of approximately 2.40:1. What's dissimilar is the manner in which that widescreen image was achieved: No Country For Old Men used the Super-35 process, by which the entire camera negative is exposed while the image is composed for and later masked at 2.40:1; Zodiac was shot with the Viper FilmStream and arrived at its aspect ratio by altering the shape of the recorded digital pixels; There Will Be Blood did it the old-fashioned way by employing Panavision anamorphic lenses that optically squeezed the photographed image and subsequently stretched it back out during projection.


Bookmark and Share
# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 4/11/2008 01:14:00 PM
Comments (0)


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2009

RECENT POSTS

IT'S HARD OUT HERE FOR A PIMP
COME TO PITCHFORK
SIX DAY WEEK
THREE TIMES IS THE CHARM
IFP ROUGH CUT LAB DEADLINE TOMORROW!
SHANE CARRUTH, PHONE HOME
CATCH-UP BLOGGING
FERRIS SAVES THE Q & A
POLITICALLY INCORRECT
A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE?


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009


blog | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact
© 2009 Filmmaker Magazine