FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Sunday, May 04, 2008
"THIS 'INDIE' PART OF THE BUSINESS" 

With the demise of New Line -- one of the two partners behind the creation of Picturehouse (HBO is the other) -- speculation has arisen over what's going to happen to the specialty shingle now that it, like New Line, has been absorbed into Warner Brothers. Warner, you remember, has Warner Independent already on its lot. Anne Thompson penned a piece in Variety stating that WIP head Polly Cohen and Picturehouse head Bob Berney "are likely to accept a bicoastal co-head arrangement." Stu Van Airsdale at Defamer ran his own story, saying that there are rumors that Berney will be "starting fresh at a new company underwritten with hedge fund cash." Now, at the end of the weekend, Jeffrey Welles at Hollywood Elsewhere posts his own piece on the rumor that Berney is leaving that contains the choice phraseology headlined above:

Now I've been told by someone very close to things that the latter scenario is not true. Berney has "been open to Warner Bros. proposals, but they actually haven't made any real decisions yet on how much they want to be in this 'indie' part of the business." They haven't made any real decisions? In my experience that means they've made a decision but lack the character to express it...no? "So this thing may drag on for some time," the insider comments.


Bookmark and Share
# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 5/04/2008 09:55:00 PM
Comments (0)


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2009

RECENT POSTS

HOLLYWOOD OR BUST
TRIBECA ANNOUNCES WINNERS IN JURIED COMPETITIONS
TRIBECA DIRECTOR INTERVIEW: JOHN MAGARY, THE SECON...
BLOGGER EXODUS
FROM REBEL TO REVENUE
LINKAGE
PORTISHEAD, THIRD
GREAT BUT PROBABLY QUITE IMPRACTICAL HORROR FILM L...
DOCS IN A SLUMP
TRIBECA DIRECTOR INTERVIEW: PAULA GAITAN, DAYS IN ...


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009


blog | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact
© 2009 Filmmaker Magazine