FILMMAKER
The Magazine of Independent Film

FILMMAKER BLOG Blog RSS Feed

Thursday, October 09, 2008
LEARNING FROM THE PORN INDUSTRY 

Even more so than independent film, the porn industry has always been ahead of the curve when it comes to capitalizing on new trends in the entertainment industry. It capitalized on home video early on and more recently has been in the forefront of downloadable content, content for iPods and PSPs, and the segmentation of content into niche-targeted "clips." Now, it may be at the forefront of dealing with two challenges -- the threat from user-generated free concert and the atomization of our attention spans.

Like both Hollywood and independent film, porn is facing tough times. In fact, they may be having it tougher because there's a somewhat interchangeable quality to much filmed porn that makes the threat from free online content on filesharing or user-generated videos even more dire.

Matthew Garrahan in the Financial Times visits an L.A. porn set and talks to industry leaders about porn's current economic challenges and how the business is confronting them.

From the piece:

With demand falling, producers are reacting by making more films, spending less on each one and selling them for knockdown prices. “It’s great for consumers,” says Fishbein. “It’s never been better because if you want to buy and own DVDs, prices are low and there’s so much choice. There are 150 websites for every niche and thousands of titles.” Porn, he adds, is easily accessible on cable, in hotels, on DVD and on the internet. “But there’s too much product ... There are a thousand new titles released a month on average, compared with probably 250 [mainstream] DVDs. Margins are falling because people are selling fewer titles.” The industry, he says, has become a victim of technological change. Technology used to power the industry, he goes on; now it is eating it alive.

This is the great irony of the predicament that the porn industry finds itself in. In the past, pornographers were pioneers who paved the way for the mass adoption of new technologies. Their willingness to embrace the fledgling VHS video format in the early 1980s proved to a sceptical Hollywood that there was a market for a nascent home entertainment format. It was a similar story with DVD: porn led the way and Hollywood followed. And again with the internet: porn producers figured out how to make money from their online operations long before more mainstream entertainment companies got in on the act.

But the internet is a great leveller and porn now finds itself in a similar situation to the music and newspaper industries, which are both struggling to adapt to the online world. The profusion of free content online has shaken established business models in those industries and relentlessly eroded their profitability. Where the music industry used to make the bulk of its money from selling albums on CD, music fans now buy only the individual tracks that they want. Or often they download them free from an illegal file-sharing site. As in music, so in porn – why buy a whole movie if all you want is a clip?


Bookmark and Share
# posted by Scott Macaulay @ 10/09/2008 10:36:00 PM
Comments (2)

 
“As in music, so in porn – why buy a whole movie if all you want is a clip?”

Isn’t that what most viewers of porn do? They’re not interested in character development or narrative, just fast-forwarding to the next sex scene.

Funny, that reminds me of Save the Tiger, with Jack Lemmon and Jack Gilford waiting to meet an arsonist in the balcony of a dark theater showing skin flicks.

Gilford: I don’t know, Harry, I’ve never seen one of these films before.

Lemmon: What’s to see? Two people humping and bumping— A guy standing off to the side muttering, “Not yet!”
# posted by Blogger Mark Mandel @ 10/10/2008 11:54 PM  

 
Porn movies are the least creative medium in the movie business. As a porn consumer, I suggest they (the porn industry) stop thinking with their wallets and start thinking like (for lack of a better metaphor) a teenager. The problem with porn presently is that the producers KNOW that consumers view a porn movie conservatively (f/forwarding to the good parts). Your average porn consumer has already been exposed to scenes of graphic nudity before the age of 18 these days. Believe me, transexual porn is NOT helping out. I think that more creative and inventive camera angles and diversity of the physical attributes of the female actresses may help in the success of the porn industry. I look on the web and see "niches"(categories of sexual acts that are less spontaneous than a Foghat concert). I rent a porn movie and see the same thing over and over, fellatio, cunnilingus, intercourse, then a "pop shot" (in that order every time, all the time). I see these bizarre sexual positions that are more robotic than a genius paralyzed in a wheelchair with an automated voice box. Producers of porn have to learn to seek creativity and spontonaeity in their movies. Porn consumers' pyche's have adapted to the norms. It's time for some creative dynamics in this genre of entertainment. Please.
# posted by Blogger Tomkatil @ 1/31/2009 3:27 AM  


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



FALL 2009

Fall 2009 Cover

RECENT POSTS

LANCE HAMMER BLOGS BALLAST
25 NEW FACES AWARDED SUNDANCE TIME WARNER STORYTEL...
KILL THEM ALL!!!
MUMBLEBEFORE: RICK LINKLATER'S SLACKER
"YOU CAN'T CALL IT 'THESE PEOPLE'"
JAMIE STUART: NYFF46 #3
TIFFANY SHLAIN ON THE CONVERSATION
THE CANDIDATES ON NEW TECHNOLOGY
TALKING 'BOUT OUR GENERATION
TRUE DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT


ARCHIVES

Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009


blog | back issues | buy print subscription | buy digital subscription | subscription FAQ | advertise | contact
© 2009 Filmmaker Magazine