Below I posted John August's take on the new iMovie HD, introduced this week at Macworld Expo. Now, the
New York Times'
David Pogue weighs in. He's mixed/positive on the update, saying that it fixes some of the previous version's deficiencies while ignoring others. But while most filmmakers don't use this consumer-level application, I can't help but think that one new iMovie development may reshape some no-budget filmmakers' creative arsenals:
Now, longtime readers may recall that I absolutely hated iMovie ’08. It wasn’t iMovie at all; Apple completely junked the beloved iMovie that had served it well for years, and replaced it with something completely unrecognizable, riddled with feature holes.
Some of those holes are filled in the new version (video effects, slow/fast motion, direct export to iDVD) and some aren’t (no export back to tape, no volume-level “rubber banding”). Overall, though, iMovie ’09 appears to be vastly more usable and complete than iMovie ’08 was. Especially when you consider its killer new feature: software stabilization.
This program can do an insanely great job of turning a bouncy, jerky handheld camcorder shot into something smooth and level (following a long period of analysis; let it run unattended while you go get lunch). I tried it on about five different clips, some of which were VERY unsteady. It works so well, a couple of observers complained that it looked unnatural; the floaty SteadiCam feeling is so noticeable, it doesn’t look like home movies anymore. No big deal; you can double-click a stabilized clip to open up an intensity slider that you can adjust to back off the effect.
In general, this feature could do wonders for the great majority of amateur videos.
Will we see the handheld wave that was launched by Jean de Segonzac's lensing of
Laws of Gravity morph into a generation of no-budget Kubricks with their gliding tracking and following shots?
Comments (4)
I just realized a few weeks ago that Final Cut 6 has this same feature. A godsend.
#
posted by David Lowery @ 1/08/2009 3:00 PM
How does it feel? Does it seem artificial? Has it caused you to do (or include) anything differently.
#
posted by Scott Macaulay @ 1/08/2009 3:09 PM
So far I've just used it to smooth out egregious dolly bumps and other such eyesores, and it fixes those just fine. I should try it out on some standard handheld stuff, though. I'd say I can't imagine getting hooked on it, but then again...
#
posted by David Lowery @ 1/08/2009 4:02 PM
Now if only someone could fix all the floaty bouncy motion blur that dances around each (now scaled up and bloated) pixel as the image stays nice and artificially still.
This is definitely a must have for some Hail Mary passes, but it's not going to replace a dolly or even a tripod.
#
posted by Eric Escobar @ 1/11/2009 2:10 AM
