Monday, June 23, 2008RAY-BAN AD BLOCKERSRemember that Phil Dick-ian John Carpenter movie, They Live? In it, a special pair of sunglasses allows you to see the world as it really is, with all of the government's subliminal messages exposed. I thought of that film while reading this blog post at Seeking Alpha entitled "How Video is Going to Take Over the World." It summarizes a Forrester research reporter claiming that we are entering an age of "Omnivideo," in which video playback will occur on multiple surfaces all throughout our daily life. From the post, quoting Forrester: “Once video becomes this easy to produce, deliver, store, and share, every agent in society will not only want to participate but will have to participate in order to have a shot at reaching people with its products and services.” I thought of the Carpenter film when reading this comment by a poster called Big Bear Lake Hostel: Someone will invent intelligent "media blocker" sunglasses for city people which will block out or noise cancel all electronic noise and video and replace all advertising with screen saver type images of your own choosing. how about wanting through times square and only hearing your favorite song, and what humans are saying around you, and instead of billboards everywhere you saw images from your flickr account wallpapering the buildings around you. a short of realtime TIVO for your physical reality.. POINTS OF IMPACTI've posted before about Hammer to Nail, the website launched this year in which Michael Tully, Mike Ryan and others are posting opinionated, passionate and politically informed reviews and commentary on independent films and the indie film scene. Today I received an email from producer Ted Hope, who announces more content at Hammer to Nail, where he, Ryan, Tully and Corbin Day will try to make sense of today's paradigm-shifting independent business. So, if you haven't already, add Hammer to Nail to your list of bookmarks. And, below, is the entirety of Hope's email: I was on a panel at the Provincetown Film Festival this weekend (which is a great festival - go!). Actually two panels, one on Towelhead (opening 9/12/08) and the other with Greg Araki, Mary Harron, Tom Kalin, John Waters, and Christine Vachon on "filmmaking on the edge". In these discussions, and in the articles attached below, it's clear that Business of Indie Film is looking for a new paradigm. We are between things and the old model no longer works and the new one is undefined. But I see some real hope nonetheless. DAY OF THE LOCUSTSTed Hope tipped me to this article in the Philadelphia Inquirer on this summer's empty arthouses. Several of the usual suspects are interviewed in a piece that talks about the high cost of marketing, the internet, downloads, the production glut and marketplace churn -- the practice of shuffling new titles out of theaters when they don't immediately click. Again, no magic solutions here, just lots of opinions, like these:
GEORGE CARLIN, R.I.P.UNIQUE CHARACTERS THE NORM AT SILVERDOCSThere are always unusual characters at SILVERDOCS: AFI/Discovery Channel Documentary Festival, from the eclectic staff and volunteers to diverse filmmakers and film subjects - the people watching is always outstanding. Primarily, the people-watching is in the movie theaters, although this year, Silverdocs was marked by the appearances of Spike Lee, recipient of the annual Guggenheim Award for lifetime excellence in social issue documentary; Music Award jurist, and pro-open source sampling documentarian/musician Paul D. Miller, (aka DJ Spooky); and on the other end of the spectrum, the theraputic robot seal, Paro, of Phie Ambo’s Mechanical Love, which looks at the brainstorming and experimenters leading the progress of android engineering. Werner Herzog is especially apt to show a person’s most unusual side. His Encounters At The End Of The World, Shows not just the confusing and bizarre terrain of the Antarctic, but the scientists and other wandering thinkers of its McMurdo Station and outlying research camps. Herzog’s documentary techniques are elegantly revealed, showing his drama-eliciting questions and allowing the subjects ample space to answer how they ended up there. More than one interview notes that anyone who isn’t tied down falls to In Herzog’s recent interview with Filmmaker, he talks about falling in love with the world through filmmaking; this idea is behind many of the other films in the program. In Gini Reticker’s Pray The Devil Back To Hell, Leymah Gbowee’s love for her war-torn Pray the Devil… seems required viewing for feminists and peaceniks, a reminder that a committed group can make serious change with non-violent protest. Pray The Devil Back to Hell won the Witness Award, which also includes $5,000 cash.
IFP alum had good showing at SILVERDOCS; Scott Hamilton Kennedy’s World Premiere screening of The Garden took the Sterling US Feature award – SILVERDOCS’ top American prize, which includes $10,000 cash and Kodak film stock. The Garden showed as a work-in-progress in 2005’s Independent Film Week “Spotlight on Documentaries” program. The Sterling US Jury, which included Sandi Dubowski, noted they gave the award for The Garden’s “tenacity in storytelling in the face of injustice, and the filmmaker's singular vision in bringing a gripping, dramatic, and important story to the public eye… It unravels a complex and layered tale of the destruction of
Sunday, June 22, 2008CLOUDBURSTINGFilm Department CEO Mark Gill spoke yesterday at the L.A. Film Festival's Financing Conference, and his speech, which Indiewire is running and which is entitled "Yes, the Sky is Really Falling," is excellent. It's a must-read summation of the current crisis in the independent film business, complete with a conclusion in which Gill discusses how one can and must survive in this business. Gill hasn't discovered any sort of magic bullet -- his advice can be boiled down to "apply smarts, passion and elbow grease"), but he's framed it all perfectly, and his lengthy discussion of the importance of quality in our 500-channel word is an important one. Here's a key paragraph: The single biggest change should be to only make movies that we absolutely love. Not ones we like. Not ones we need to do as a favor. Not the ones we do because they seem like a good "piece of business." Not ones we do because we think, hope or wish that "the kids" will like them. Not the knock-offs of the ones that worked at the box office last year. In a word, we should only pick the films we're passionate about--and that have an audience. Saturday, June 21, 2008FOOL'S PARADISEThere's a good conversation going on at the always excellent blog of Jon Taplin. Entitled "Who Will the Next Fool Be," the short piece, which I'm taking the liberty of quoting in its entirety, critiques the recently announced deal in which India's Reliance may be financing Dreamworks. Here's Taplin's post: The movie business reminds me of that old Charlie Rich Tune, “Who will the next fool be?”. The news that a unit of one of India’s largest Conglomerate, Reliance, is contemplating starting a new Dreamworks 2 in what the Times article hints could be horrible terms. OMG! When will the world of finance finally learn? Two kinds of people make money in the movie business:Top Talent and Distribution. Everybody else, including off balance sheet finance, get screwed. First it was Wall Street (Steve Ross Era up to about 1982). Since then it has been British and German Tax Shelters, French (Canal Plus & Warner) TV partners, Japanese and Korean equity,Australian Equity (Village Road Show), Tech Moguls (Paul Allen), Hedge funds (recently badly burned & very under reported). Everyone of them thought they were the coolest kid on the block. But they all quickly retreated from the business.Hollywood is off bounds for most Arab investors, unless they had gone secular like Dodi Fayed of London and Princess Di fame. So all that’s left is the Indians and The Chinese . The comments thread is already heating up with posts from people who obviously know something about the film biz. Rachel writes, "I think of it as the dinner party factor. It’s so much more interesting to be able to talk about the film you just financed than it is to talk about the expansion of your infrastructure fund. Well, maybe not more interesting, but of more interest to non-financial people. Plus these guys might get to meet [insert star du jour] at the premiere, or even at Cannes/Sundance/Berlin yada yada." Another poster, Ken B., writes, "In addition to the ego factor, there are other factors that can bring in the piece-of-the-action investors: for some it’s a tax shelter guaranteed to make a controlled business loss, a few use inflated production budgets as a money laundry that can process large amounts of cash, and then there have always been those who get caught up in the high stakes casino aspects." SNAGGING ITAll the industry news seems to break right when we are finishing an issue and don't have the time to properly parse it. Fortunately, Scott Kirsner is on the case at his CinemaTech blog, beating everyone to the punch with his news of SnagFilms, an interesting new distribution application that will enable filmmakers to receive ad revenue from the internet streaming of their films. More: Snag isn't going to try to create a destination site for film fans, but is building a video "widget" that can be placed on other sites: a filmmaker's site, a blog run by an advocacy group, a Facebook profile, anywhere. The widget will deliver streaming film clips, trailers, shorts, and in some cases entire features, peppered with advertisements. Kirsner has a lot more, including what he has heard is the revenue split, at the link. The site is being launched by Ted Leonsis, who I have written about here, and AOL True Stories. Also this week: news of the just launched YouTube Screening Room, the viral video giant's platform promising revenue to independent filmmakers. Friday, June 20, 2008BLOGGING THE SUNDANCE DOC LAB![]() Filmmaker is hosting blogs from several of the participants of the various Sundance Labs this summer. Here's part one of producer/director Deann Borshay Liem's (Precious Objects of Desire) from the Sundance Documentary Edit and Storytelling Lab, which runs June 21 - 28. Sometimes I refer to myself as “she.” This is because I’m a character in my own film and I have to separate who I am in real life with who I am on screen. Fortunately I’m a Gemini so this splitting into two (or more) doesn’t seem that odd. Any other editor might think this was nuts, but my editor, Vivien Hillgrove, has a bit of Gemini in her too, so between the two (or more) of us, we get by fine in the edit room. Duality has always been a theme in my life. I was particularly fascinated as a kid with stories about babies who were switched at birth and grew up in the wrong families. It turns out I had been switched, too, not as a baby, but at the age of 8 with a girl I had never met. In the film, PRECIOUS OBJECTS OF DESIRE, I go to Korea in search of this “double” in an effort to resolve mysteries about her (and my) identity. The story of this search serves as the narrative spine for an exploration of the history and ethics of international adoptions from Korea, beginning with the Korean War. I received funding for the film from the Sundance Institute and now have the privilege of attending the Sundance Edit/Story Lab coming up in a couple of days. To establish a kind of baseline, this is where we are. We have 80 minutes of an early assembly. It’s not a full assembly yet, but a series of scenes and character sketches strung together. Vivien and I will be screening this before our fellow filmmakers and advisors this weekend to get their (hopefully merciful) input. I wish we were further along, at the rough cut stage. But we’re not. I may sound calm about this, but deep inside I’m trembling. I’m writing this blog in part at the Institute’s invitation, but also as an opportunity to share my experiences at the Lab. Since the Lab focuses on editing and story development, I thought I’d try to write about the working/creative relationship with my editor, as well as about our experiences at the Lab itself. But who knows, my other self may change her mind once the Lab starts and end up writing about something else. More soon… Deann Borshay Liem Photo caption: Before we were invited to the Sundance Lab, nice and relaxed. (L to R – Vivien Hillgrove, Deann Borshay Liem, Charlotte Lagarde) EXPLETIVES DELETEDTwo pieces have been published online reporting on the current financial situation at THINKFilm, owned by David Bergstein, who purchased the company along with Capitol Films in 2006. In IndieWire, Anthony Kaufman details the efforts of some filmmakers to receive the overdue minimum advances they are owed by THINK. He also gets a quote on the issue from THINKFilm CEO Mark Urman. From the piece: A determined, but frustrated, Mark Urman told indieWIRE this week that he's communicating with his filmmakers and making every effort to get people paid. "I feel terrible if people are hurt by our financial problems," he said. "We're not moving forward on other people's blood, I can assure you. We're not [EXPLETIVE] people; we're in trouble. And if people end up getting [EXPLETIVE], we're [EXPLETIVE], too, and we can all be on the unemployment lines together." Today, A.J. Schnack has published a story about filmmaker Alex Gibney, who has announced a lawsuit against THINKfilm over the release of his Oscar-winning Taxi to the Dark Side. Schnack quotes a press release issued by X-Ray, Gibney's production company: "X-Ray asserts, among other things, that THINKFilm did not have the financial resources to properly release the film and fraudulently concealed this fact from the film’s creative team, its investors and the film’s sales agent, Cinetic Media Inc. Further, the demand asserts that THINKFilm’s actions damaged “Taxi,” its commercial reputation and its future possibilities for commercial success. X-Ray seeks damages, payment of legal fees as well as a termination of its agreement with ThinkFilm and a return of its distribution rights. BALLAST LEAVES IFC FOR STRAND![]() According to Variety, Lance Hammer's Sundance award-winning film Ballast has dropped out of its deal with IFC and has moved to Strand Releasing. An excerpt: "Obviously, we're disappointed, but how can we not support him if he tries to take control of this himself?" IFC Entertainment veep of acquisitions Arianna Bocco said. "We wanted the movie, we love the movie, and we think that we would have done really well with it. It's the first time that's happened with us." Originally slated for the summer, Filmmaker has confirmed it's moving to a fourth quarter release. Thursday, June 19, 2008NEWFEST CROWNS ITS QUEENDO NOT PRESS...... if you want to do anything other than procrastinating what you are supposed to be doing right now. ![]() Actually, do not press here. Friday, June 13, 2008THE PERVERT'S GUIDE TO CINEMAIf you are a regular -- like, hourly -- reader of this blog, you know something about In Spring, the short Jamie Stuart piece which was posted on his own site and linked here only to be taken down shortly thereafter. Some (including, I'll admit, me) wondered if Stuart had, in his continual skirmishing with the confines of publicity in the service of artmaking, crossed some kind of line with this piece, which incorporated a real interview with a misidentified Werner Herzog (who Stuart painted in 2005, shown here) in the THINKfilm office within a fictional mock documentary on the distribution company. Now, Stuart at his Stream blog writes about the piece, about not only its technical realization but also its conceptual intent. For Stuart fans, it's as close as we're probably ever going to get to an aesthetic manifesto from the guy. You can check it out here. SUNDANCE DIRECTORS' LAB, EPOCH TWO![]() Here's writer/director John Magary's (pictured here with Robert Redford and Vilmos Zsigmond) second dispatch from the Sundance Directors' Lab: This is my first stab at blogging, okay? I’ve never been a self-starting chronicler, never had a personal essay phase, or a journal, or a sketchbook. I’m not wired that way. I don’t really know how to steal away time in bars or cafes, to reflect on my day in an endearingly scruffy little notebook—even a grocery list is a chore. Long story short, I’m finishing up my second week here, and I have no notes. It’s blurs on top of blurs. Super-blurs, hyper-blurs, and where to go for some peace and quiet and that Alone Time with a hot cup of Sanka? Case in point, this is a Sunday, my “free day,” and here’s how it played out: 2:00-4:30, Screening of Little Fauss and Big Halsy (1970), starring a swaggering and shirtless Robert Redford, presented by Nicky Katt. Nicky, whom you’ve seen in probably more movies than you realize and who’s something of a mad cinephile, is acting in Daniel Casey’s Lab project Poletown. He keeps referencing movies that I’ve never heard of, severely fraying my adequacy levels. 4:30-5:30, Filmmaker Meeting, wherein we Directing Fellows air out our laundry, talk about the Process, laugh, cry, what have you. 5:30-6:15, Adviser Reception, wherein we meet the new advisers. The advisers, as you can imagine, are tasked with making us better. Among them (again, no notes) this week, Robert Elswit, Fernando Leon de Aranoa, and Michael Almereyda. Talk about your solid bunches, whoa. Last week was Robert Redford, Vilmos Zsigmond, Ira Sachs, Joan Tewksbury, Thomas Carter, Suzy Elmiger, and Christine Lahti, so help was frighteningly abundant. Mr. Zsigmond screened Close Encounters. Ms. Tewksbury, Nashville. Gyula Gazdag, A Hungarian Fairy Tale, which is a more or less impossible-to-see gem. The screenings are mega-awesome-sweet, I won’t lie. 6:15-7ish, Screening of the week’s scenes, wherein we Directing Fellows watch our edits in a room full of crew, staff, actors, and advisers. It’s a sweaty-palm kinda thing. (More about the PUBLIC aspect below.) 7:00-8:00, eat at buffet, which always has fruit, which is neat. 8:00-10:30, watch adviser Fernando Leon de Aranoa’s Mondays in the Sun, a simple and keenly observed study of laid-off friends in northern Spain. Starring Javier Bardem, who’s surprisingly hilarious for a paunchy, laid-off Spaniard. I’m describing his character, not him, so cool your jets. Yeah, eight and a half hours of activities, and it’s my free day. Some were optional, but still—it’s an exhausting embarrassment of riches here. And so I lie, in blankets, way beyond the witching hour, and I’ve gotta be up at 6:45 in the morning, to walk halfway down a mountain, eat something/anything, and edit for nine hours, and I want to paint a picture for ya. Dear Reader, how do I compress it? What would you like to know? I see no comments after my first post, so maybe it’s moot. (Do I offend?) I also see the picture with me and Gyula—pronounced JOO-la, and he’s not a Bond villain, he’s great, he’s Hungarian and an amazing director and wise and kind and supportive—and notice my noontime physique, my shape rounding off like a soldier six months out of Iraq. It’s buffet eating here, and me no good at restraining so much at the buffet. Apologies to my girlfriend. Speaking of war and wars, the Lab is joked about as a boot camp for filmmakers. It’s not hyperbole, really. There is a rigid, almost relentless dedication to fitness here. Even something as seemingly straightforward as editing—when all is said and done, two people banging away in a small dark room—can feel like one of those Zero-G machines they fling you through in Air Force training. The thing in Spies Like Us. That thing. I will focus, I must. Let’s talk about the public aspect, which takes some getting used to. I was talking with another Fellow, a commercial director named Frank Budgen, who’s brought a darkly comic adaptation called Shockheaded Peter to the Lab—of the Fellows, he’s worked on the most massive scales, piling up extras in Rio, animating clay bunnies in the middle of Manhattan, a city-wide water balloon fight in Buenos Aires, that kind of thing. Even considering the broad, high-budget, million-choices-a-minute experience, he was taken aback by how very open we have to be here. Everyone, from Lab head Michelle Satter down to the boom ops, seems to have read all the scripts, and there’s always some kind of audience, their eyeballs blinking in the cartoon dark. I’ll be digging down in a bag of Lays and four people will come up to tell me that they like Antoinette, who’s not a relative or friend, but a character I’ve written. Support borders on the maniacal, in a good way. Shy ones are plucked out like errant hairs. There is a pungent, we’re-all-here-to-try-stuff-out-even-if-we-look-like-idiots vibe, and at first, cynic that I am, it all felt a bit…humiliating… But the sunny smiles and the mountain air and the wise eyes of Gyula (there’s a title: The Wise Eyes of Gyula) have somehow beaten me into a glassy-eyed, productive spirit. I’m not sure I’ve created anything good yet, and the Fear’s still there, but at least I’ve cast off those thoughts of stealing a jeep and peeling out, Zero-G, into the Utah wilderness. Labels: Sundance Thursday, June 12, 2008PRIDE OF PLACE![]() If you are in Chicago this next month -- or, perhaps, if you've got frequent flier miles or simple wanderlust -- then I highly recommend checking out Enter Dream, a photo show by writer, photographer and critic Ray Pride, whose work is well known to readers of Filmmaker as well as those of his own Movie City Indie blog. Ray's evocative photos are visually stunning and haunted by the idea of cinema -- they contain potent traces of storytelling, whiffs of dramatic atmosphere, and suggestions of character. Here's the official spam: The photographs in “Enter Dream” anatomize the geography of Chicago night, forbidding and delicious as these streets might be to a runaway child. Things left behind. Escape routes. Mute facades. Fearful horizons. Landscapes both bright and dark. The creatures that populate threatening places and moments familiar to ghosts, insomniacs and those who fear sleep and dreams to come. A city that does not know you, glimpsed in shards and captured in telling tableaus. The images, large and small, capture specific moments, but also intimately specific moods. William S. Burroughs wrote, “The important fact about urban living: the continued stream of second attention awareness. Every license plate, street sign, passing strangers, are saying something to you.” There are messages in “Enter Dream,” if you were to recognize them, if you were there to decipher them. The show runs from June 13 through July 9 at Medicine Park. The opening reception is tomorrow night (June 13) at 8 p.m. Click on the link for more info. Wednesday, June 11, 2008IFP's Independent Filmmaker Labs kick off 2008 Narrative LabCURTAINS FOR NYC![]() New York City was once known for its bountiful movie going choices, mainly its revival houses and midnight movie screenings. Cult legends such as Rocky Horror Picture Show, Eraserhead and Liquid Sky made quite a splash through these alternate distribution choices, and we as moviegoers were all the better for it. Sadly, those days seem very far away, what with the almost total domination of DVD and Netflix. Some theaters, however, are still keeping the torch burning: Landmark's Sunshine is one that comes to mind, with their weekend midnight screenings of classic cult and arthouse fare. But hands down, my fave would have to be The Pioneer over in the East Village. They've been offering great film revivals and midnight shows, along with edgier first-run theatrical fare. ![]() This weekend, to celebrate Friday the 13th, we are to be treated to a rare screening of a new 35mm print of 80s Canadian horror classic Curtains, complete with an appearance by star Lesleh Donaldson. Bringing this obscure, thoroughly enjoyable gem back to the screen is a stroke of twisted genius. It's exactly why I love The Pioneer. And with the weather as steamy as it's been, what better way to relax than in a cool theater with soda, popcorn and your favorite slasher movie? Labels: cult movies, horror, midnight movies, theaters Tuesday, June 10, 2008WHERE FILM AND INTERNET WOUND UPOver at Stream, Eric Kohn has a good write-up of the "Where Film and Internet Collide" event we hosted at the IFC Center last week with the IFP and IndieGoGo. He does a great job of summarizing the interviews with the creators of the various works we screened. Another good report is by the Film Panel Notetaker. Click on the links and read -- between the two of them you'll feel like you were there. Monday, June 09, 2008NEWFEST 2008: HERE, QUEER, IN ITS 20TH YEARNajarra Townsend; Director, Stewart Wade We're here. We're Queer (or at least by association). Let's go to the movies. As of this Thursday, June 5th NewFest, New York’s premier LGBT film festival has begun, and it will be rolling out gay-oriented flicks through Sunday, June 15th. This being its 20th anniversary year, the festival has seen a great deal of change in virtually all of its essential elements: filmmaking, New York City, and gay culture – and the films of NewFest class of 2008 reflect this change like a drag queen to a make-up mirror. The four themes of the festival this year are The Early Years of AIDS, Activism/Repression, Parenthood, and African American Images and nearly all of the films seem to fit neatly into one or more of these categories. “These themes come up organically from submissions,” NewFest’s Artistic Director Basil Tsiokos tells me, “We don’t seek out films that fit into pre-conceived categories.” Thus moviegoers this year can expect a number of poignant looks at past and present, where gay culture and filmmaking in general have been, and where they are going. New Yorkers looking to revel in the nostalgia of gay New York of yesterday can look to The Universe of Keith Haring or SqueezeBox! both of which recently screened at the Tribeca film festival. Those looking for innovative filmmakers that stand up to any audience of progressive cinephiles should head to Japan Japan an Israeli film that mixes kaleidoscope imagery with understated, impressive acting and a fresh style of filmmaking. Those looking to understand where gay culture is going can look to films like Bi the Way an honest and intelligent documentary that seeks to understand trends in bisexuality in America. Regardless of all the changes that have gone on over the past 20 years, it is clear from the general feel in the air at Thursday’s opening night Gala screening of Tru Loved, a glossy LA centric crowd pleaser, that NewFest has been bringing crowds back for 20 years not just because they find films that will succeed outside of an insular LGBT film festival circuit, but because they continue to nurture a New York audience that seeks to understand a little more of themselves and others, and while they’re doing it, like Cyndi Lauper says, they “just wanna have fun!” GOING TO THE MOVIESFilmInFocus is running a four-part series on exhibition, from the ultra-small-scale screenings of the microcinema movement to the shape of things to come for blockbuster moviegoing. The first part, Ed Halter's take on microcinema, is up now. Sunday, June 08, 2008STORYBOARDING TARKOVSKY AT THE SUNDANCE LABS![]() The Sundance Director's Lab is underway, and one of the participants, John Magary (pictured at right with Sundance Lab advisor Gyula Gazdag), has agreed to blog it for Filmmaker. Here's the first of his posts. SUNDANCE, EPOCH 1 Day One smelled like chicken. Day Three smells like farts. I’m not talking about the Lab — haven’t gotten there yet. One can be coaxed out of a crippling fear of flying—it is irrational, after all—but heights is another matter. With heights, all you can say is, “Oh, stop being so scared.” (Hot tip: saying things like that to a phobic isn’t remotely helpful.) And I guess I knew that an Amtrak train ride from New York to Salt Lake City might at some point teeter along the trembling biceps of the Rockies, but still I’m wondering, “Can not our country build its own national subway?” Cuz you can’t fall when you’re underground. (There’s that weird feeling when you travel through the Big parts of America, right? You want to swallow stuff up: what you’re seeing is simultaneously too much and never enough. It’s huge, a little terrifying, a little garish: a landscape painted with free market urges. America knows this: God is a capitalist.) I was told by just about everyone that this fifty-four hour journey would more or less cure me of my “fear”—their quotes. You’ll be cooped up for hours on end in a small space, they said, a small space that smells like farts, and the people will be weird and you’ll be late to every stop and the food’s bad. But so far it’s had the opposite effect. The slowness, the pretty views, the generous legroom and little pillows (two!), the conversations about office space engineering, states’ laws regarding pasteurized goats’ milk, what exactly a “tumbleweed” is—it’s all been pretty amazing. Okay, that’s a lie, not amazing, but pleasant. Or, pleasant enough. Look, I hate flying. And the food’s just fine, thanks. Besides, I’m on a TRAIN, rolling through this crazy land of ours! Comrades! Watch me hurtle! I’m splitting this country in two! IN TWO! And there goes a denim jacket with an iron-on kitty that says, “BUG ME AT YOUR OWN RISK.” (I don’t get it.) Disclosure time. Filmmaker Magazine agreed to pay me $75 per word to write this blog, so you’ll understand if the syntax gets unnecessarily complicated, the language purple. If I can stretch it out enough—like limitless, infinite, inexhaustible, measureless taffy pulled from puddles of moonlight, darkest, blackest, bluest moonlight--I might clear two years’ salary in just a few posts. And yes, I will be paraphrasing Kubrick a lot here. (“As Stanley Kubrick said while shooting A Clockwork Orange, ‘a stitch in time saves nine.’”) And I will occasionally talk about the Sundance Directors’ Lab, and what we are doing there. Like, here’s a nugget. I am currently storyboarding (or trans-storyboarding, or whatever) a scene from Arnaud Desplechin’s My Sex Life…or How I Got Into an Argument. It has Marion Cotillard—ten-years-ago Marion Cotillard, I only just realized this--and she’s naked, so I’m trying to watch it against a backwall, so that no one can see what I’m watching, you know, so as not to offend the lady in the denim jacket. Feels a little pervy, but Sundance asked for this. An advisor at the Lab, Gyula Gazdag (wasn’t he a Bond villain?), asked that we pluck two scenes from movies we love or hate, and storyboard them. So I have My Sex Life and an early scene from Tarkovsky’s The Mirror (natch). Both scenes are well-loved, and both, predictably, had a lot more going on in them than I realized. I taught directing to undergrads last year, and this exercise would’ve been helpful for them. Damnit. It’s always useful to break down a scene that somehow beguiles you. With these two scenes, Tarkovsky and Desplechin—two very different filmmakers, obviously—play around a great deal with point-of-view, and a kind of hide-and-seek blocking, and achieve something magical through very different means. Tarkovsky, with his long crane-set takes floating over the grass, and Desplechin, with his seemingly improvised jump cuts and frame-rate-ramping. Train just stopped again. Not at, like, a platform—just somewhere in the mountains. For an hour. Put your money in railroads, guys. This! Is! The Future! The man I talked to about office engineering, whose wife ordered a steak with peculiar gusto, said they were headed to San Francisco. The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco, I told him. (Stanley Kubrick said that.) I’m dancing around this, okay? I am a little nervous about this Lab. How’d I get myself into this? Am I remotely ready for this throttling? One way to comfort yourself is to say, “Well, I don’t deserve this.” Then it all gets to be like a joke, and then you can go on being fearless again. But yeah, I’m bringing a lot of Fear to the Lab. A suitcase full. Wednesday, June 04, 2008SUBMITTING TO HITCHCOCKA couple of new writers have been added to the Spout Blog, and one, Lauren Wissot, has her first post up today. Wissot is a filmmaker and writer who has written for her own blog, Beyond the Green Door, as well as The House Next Door. Her debut piece for Spout is entitled "Dial S/M for Marnie" and it looks at Hitchcock's film through the lens of kink: An excerpt: What neither the feminists nor cinephiles seem to appreciate is that Marnie is one of the greatest bondage and discipline (B&D in sadomasochistic parlance) pics of all time. Artfully disguised as a psychosexual thriller, Hitchcock’s classic is actually kin to The Story of O with Hedren’s O-like Marnie at the sole mercy of Sir Connery’s sexy daddy (think Sir Stephen), reduced to being trapped like a wild animal to be broken and trained, owned and cared for, eventually becoming Rutland’s wife/slave. This ain’t misogyny – it’s erotic art! SAG 'S INDIE WAIVERSMichael Fleming and Dave McNary have a piece in Variety on SAG's granting of waivers to independent productions allowing them to proceed with their shoots undeterred by the possible upcoming strike. From the piece: The stars and studios are nonetheless gearing up for the worst possible scenario. The current number of waivers is triple what SAG had signed three months ago -- and an indication there will be a modicum of feature shooting in the coming months. Some of the indie folk who have already taken advantage of SAG's offer: Mel Gibson, Oliver Stone and Antoine Fuqua. Oh, and also Werner Herzog, who is apparently gearing up his Bad Lieutenant remake. Tuesday, June 03, 2008PARAMOUNT VANTAGE: CONSOLIDATED!![]() Nikke Finke at her Deadline Hollywood Daily is reporting that the marketing, distribution and physical production departments of Paramount Vantage are being folded into its parent company, Paramount. Here's the official press release: Paramount Pictures and Paramount Vantage today announced the consolidation of its marketing, distribution and physical production departments, which will serve both entities. The merged marketing department will be lead by Gerry Rich (President, Worldwide Motion Picture Marketing). Megan Colligan and Josh Greenstein who were promoted to Co-Presidents of Domestic Marketing, will report to Mr. Rich. The consolidated distribution department will be lead by Jim Tharp (President, Domestic Theatrical Distribution) and the combined physical production department will be headed by Georgia Kacandes, Executive Vice President, Physical Production. Mr. Tharp and Mr. Rich will continue to report to Rob Moore, Vice Chairman, Paramount Pictures. Georgia Kacandes will report to Brad Weston, President, Production, Paramount Films. This isn't comparable to the shutdown of Picturehouse and Warner Independent which, despite Warner President and COO Alan Horn's protestations to the contrary, really does seem to signal that studio's departure from the independent business. Paramount Vantage head Nick Meyer is still in place, and he'll continue to report to Paramount Film Group President John Lesher, who formerly ran Vantage. But it's definitely another blow to the idea that specialty films need their own specialized marketing and distribution departments to properly release their films. Anne Thompson reports on this news here at Variety. AVOIDING THE INDIES?A lot of political bloggers (which I've been reading to check out the responses to tonight's amazing but also surreal evening of politics, which included not only the speeches by the three major candidates but also Terry McCauliffe's bizarre, would-be comedy act on The Daily Show) have been linking to "101 Movies to Avoid Watching Before You Die" on the Crooked Timber site. The point of the post is self-evident; it's a riff on those lists like The Guardian's "1000 Films to Watch Before You Die." And as an independent film champion, I'm startled by a lot of the responses the blog has prompted. I'm reminded of Harmony Korine's quip about Janet Maslin's review of Gummo, which read, "October is not too early to call Gummo the worst film of the year"; Harmony would always say with surprise, "And that was the year of Eight Heads in a Duffle Bag!" What's on the Crooked Timber list so far? What are those films that eke even more life force from a dying soul? Well, there are a lot of indie films nominated -- yep, the films we imagine provide a respite from the hollowness of studio product. Here are a few: Chasing Amy; House of Sand and Fog; Happiness; My Dinner with Andre; Junebug; Magnolia; Kids; Reservoir Dogs; Pulp Fiction; "the entire oeuvre of Gregg Araki"; Leaving Las Vegas; The Usual Suspects; and Juno. WHERE FILM AND INTERNET COLLIDE (AT THE IFC CENTER)![]() Thursday, June 5, Filmmaker, the IFC, IndieGoGo and the IFP are hosting an evening at the IFC Center that is part of Internet Week New York. It's called "Where Film and Internet Collide," and it's one of three events going under this name that are dedicated to the merging of filmic and web sensibilities when it comes to creating new work. At the IFC we'll be screening a number of interesting works created for the web and then will be discussing these works and web production in general with their creators. There will be plenty of time for questions, so if you have an interest in taking your film production online, now's the chance to get tips from people who are already out there doing it. Here's the official spam:
I'll be moderating the event and hope to see a bunch of you there. |
RAY-BAN AD BLOCKERS
POINTS OF IMPACT
DAY OF THE LOCUSTS
GEORGE CARLIN, R.I.P.
UNIQUE CHARACTERS THE NORM AT SILVERDOCS
CLOUDBURSTING
FOOL'S PARADISE
SNAGGING IT
BLOGGING THE SUNDANCE DOC LAB
EXPLETIVES DELETED
BALLAST LEAVES IFC FOR STRAND
NEWFEST CROWNS ITS QUEEN
DO NOT PRESS...
THE PERVERT'S GUIDE TO CINEMA
SUNDANCE DIRECTORS' LAB, EPOCH TWO
PRIDE OF PLACE
IFP's Independent Filmmaker Labs kick off 2008 Narrative Lab
CURTAINS FOR NYC
WHERE FILM AND INTERNET WOUND UP
NEWFEST 2008: HERE, QUEER, IN ITS 20TH YEAR
GOING TO THE MOVIES
STORYBOARDING TARKOVSKY AT THE SUNDANCE LABS
SUBMITTING TO HITCHCOCK
SAG 'S INDIE WAIVERS
PARAMOUNT VANTAGE: CONSOLIDATED!
AVOIDING THE INDIES?
WHERE FILM AND INTERNET COLLIDE (AT THE IFC CENTER)
Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010