TOO MUCH FAITH

By in News
on Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

Cinematic sinners are accustomed to squawking when the MPAA threatens an NC-17 on a guns-blazing, sex-filled entertainment. But Matt Drudge links today to a report from the Scripps Howard News Service which describes a complaint by a group of Christian moviemakers behind a movied called Facing the Giants who say that the MPAA has given them a PG rating (instead of a G) because their film is “too evangelistic.”

From the piece:

The MPAA, noted [Provident Films v.p. of marketing Kris] Fuhr, tends to offer cryptic explanations for its ratings. In this case, she was told that it “decided that the movie was heavily laden with messages from one religion and that this might offend people from other religions. It’s important that they used the word ‘proselytizing’ when they talked about giving this movie a PG. …

“It is kind of interesting that faith has joined that list of deadly sins that the MPAA board wants to warn parents to worry about.”

Overt Christian messages are woven throughout “Facing the Giants,” which isn’t surprising since the film was co-written and co-produced by brothers Alex and Stephen Kendrick, who are the “associate pastors of media” at Sherwood Baptist Church in Albany, Ga. In addition to working with the megachurch’s cable-television channel, they created its Sherwood Pictures ministry _ collecting private donations to fund a $25,000 movie called “Flywheel,” about a wayward Christian used-car salesman.

“Facing the Giants” cost $100,000 and resembles a fusion of the Book of Job and a homemade “Hoosiers,” or perhaps a small- school “Friday Night Lights” blended with the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association movies that used to appear in some mainstream theaters. Sherwood Pictures used local volunteers as actors and extras, backed by a small crew of tech professionals.

The movie includes waves of answered prayers, a medical miracle, a mysterious silver-haired mystic who delivers a message from God and a bench-warmer who kicks a 51-yard field goal to win the big game when his handicapped father pulls himself out of a wheelchair and stands under the goal post to inspire his son’s faith.

Tags:

You can follow any follow up comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

  • Anonymous

    I think it is unfortunate that a movie teaching morals and character is seen as inappropriate. What about all the sex and violent filled films? Shouldn’t those be the films that need parental guidance?

  • M. Jason Mercer

    Look at the problems our society has now and ask why? This is a perfect example of how a country built on religion and faith can get transformed and fall. I feel terrible about the battles that all children will face in the next 50 yrs. if we as parents dont stand up NOW for what is right. This is a film that any parent should encourage their children to watch. Why are people so afraid to stand up for something that will only bring “good”? “MJM”

  • Anonymous

    I’ve already received a forwarded email about this which made it sound like a general onslaught on faith/Christianity is being waged by the MPAA. Is it only this particular film that has received a rating based on those considerations?

  • Scott Macaulay

    Well, I should say a few things. I thought this was an interesting article to link to because independent filmmakers often tangle with the MPAA when adult issues are dealt with in serious ways. The filmmakers often have to cut their films in order not to receive an “NC-17″ rating, which more or less dooms a film commercially. Given this, it is interesting and ironic that a group of Christian moviemakers are complaining about an MPAA rating being given to a film on the basis of a religious dialogue.

    That being said, I think everyone should note that the rating being discussed here is a PG rating, which doesn’t restrict anybody from seeing the film and doesn’t dissuade any theater from showing it. The filmmakers wanted a G, apparently, and didn’t get one, but I can’t believe it’s going to hurt their film. In fact, like indie filmmakers who often use an unfavorable MPAA rating to publicize their film, I wouldn’t be surprised if these filmmakers aren’t doing the same thing. More people know about the film now and the rating won’t stop anyone from seeing it.

  • Anonymous

    The film “Facing the Giants” deals with issues including depression, pregnancy, and sports violence. Given these themes, a PG rating is entirely appropriate. The MPAA has denied statements that the rating was related to Christian themes, including the above quote. This story is an example of Christian paranoia, not MPAA mis-behavior.

  • alamuchy

    The film wasn’t rated PG because it wasn’t wholesome movie. It’s just that any film that has a strong thematic element whether it is religion or other get’s a PG rating. It’s not a negative rating. It’s a system that has been in affect for years. The filmmakers are just trying to get free press at the MPAA’s cost. Now is that very Christian to trash the MPAA???

VOD CALENDAR

Filmmaker's curated calendar of the latest video on demand titles.
All In: The Poker Movie A NY Thing #Regeneration
See the VOD Calendar →
Filmmaker's Best Of 2011

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Filmmaker Magazine is powered by WordPress.org.