request - Filmmaker Magazine
Paul Devlin's Power Trip is a tragicomic portrait of the pitfalls of capitalism in one republic of the former Soviet empire. JT LeRoy talks with the director.

Paul Devlin's Power Trip.

The arrest last fall of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Russia’s richest man and head of its largest oil company, Yukos, is a troubling development that has captured the attention of the world press. Although Khodorkovsky is no model citizen — a onetime functionary in the Communist Party youth organization, he emerged from a dubious privatization auction in 1995 with control over one of Russia’s biggest oil companies — over the past three years he has nonetheless become an outspoken advocate for greater transparency in business, laying out Yukos’s financials for everyone to see while publicly challenging President Vladimir Putin by supporting parliamentary opposition parties.

The travails of Khodorkovsky, however, are hardly an isolated incident in Russia: business tycoon Vladimir Gusinsky — owner of Media-Most, which controls the independent television channel NTV and a radio station that have been critical of the Kremlin — has been accused of fraud and is not allowed to leave the country; Russian tax police have opened criminal cases against several other firms, including the country’s leading oil company, Lukoil, and its biggest carmaker, AVTOVAZ. Prosecutors have also raised questions about the privatization of companies such as Norilsk Nikel, Russia’s largest nickel producer; and the country’s huge energy monopoly, UAS, has come under fire.

The crackdown on Russia’s oligarchs may be a necessary correction to widespread fraud and embezzlement, or, as many believe, it may signal a more troubling backlash against free enterprise and the rise of democracy in a country still largely ruled by former functionaries of the Soviet Politburo and the KGB.

Paul Devlin’s Power Trip, which documents the challenges faced by an American energy company, AES, following its purchase of Telasi, the largest supplier of electricity in the former Soviet republic of Georgia, offers compelling support for the latter: the transition to democracy and the development of a viable market economy throughout the former Soviet Union is fraught with problems unimaginable in the West.

Devlin gained unprecedented access to AES Telasi through a former university classmate, Piers Lewis, who was hired by AES as strategic project director to upgrade the republic of Georgia’s power supply and to begin charging for the delivery of electricity to consumers. AES Telasi spent more than $90 million improving the power lines and metering customers in Tbilisi, the capital, but when the company sent out its bills — averaging $24 a month in a city where the average wage is as little as $15 a month — the vast majority of Georgians refused to pay. AES Telasi, which at one point was losing an estimated $120,000 a day, simply cut off their power.

Public unrest grew; many of the power company’s meters were vandalized, and others were simply jury-rigged to steal electricity. But AES Telasi was steadfast: customers must learn to pay for the service.

Even paying customers, however, infrequently received electricity in Tbilisi, where blackouts became a daily occurrence. As AES discovered, the electricity supply was routinely diverted to government facilities, many of which had not paid their own electric bills, under orders from the energy minister.

Indeed, electricity is not the only power at stake in Power Trip. Novelist JT Leroy talks with director Paul Devlin.

Piers Lewis in Paul Devlin's Power Trip.

Filmmaker: First of all, let’s say what the film is about.

Paul Devlin:Power Trip is about corruption, assassination and street rioting over electricity in the former Soviet republic of Georgia. It follows the story of an American corporation trying to solve the electricity crisis there, which is crushed by post-Soviet chaos.” I’ve got that pretty well memorized.

Production Format
Mini DV.
Camera Manufacturer and Model
Sony TRV-900 and Sony PC-100.
Film Stock
Tape-to-35mm film conversion at Alpha-Cine Labs.
Editing System
Avid Media Composer 400 (AVR-2).
Mini DV Conform and Color Correction
Avid Express DV.
Additional Color Correction and Output to DigiBeta
Avid Symphony.
Film Look Treatment, Titles and Final Color Correction
Sony DigiBeta linear on-line suite (Sony 9100 editor controller, Sony 7150 digital swithcher, DME 7000 for color correction and Pinnacle Deko for titles).
Filmmaker: It’s almost like a Catholic catechism.

Devlin: Can’t stumble on the pitch, especially with a story that’s so tricky to describe. Otherwise, you lose people right away. I really believe in the nonfiction film genre, but I think we have a bad rap because of the word “documentary,” and I try not to use it. LA Weekly called Power Trip “a real-life thriller.” Someone else called it a dark comedy. So as we go out in the market theatrically, we’re trying to find alternatives to the word “documentary” and emphasize that this movie is entertaining. You’ll learn a lot about a world you never knew before, but it will be fun to watch; there are funny parts and there’s also tragedy. And those are the elements that make up the best fiction films as well.

Filmmaker: When I was watching the film, at first AES Telasi come across as the bad guys. These poor Georgian people, they’ve had free electricity their whole lives, they don’t have much money — how are they expected to pay for it? But as the film went on, I found myself actually rooting for AES. You realize, what they’re doing is trying to raise the level of responsibility in a country devoid of accountability.

Devlin: That was part of my own journey as well. I know Piers Lewis, the main character in the film who is also manager of AES, the massive American “global power company.” I saw Piers and AES doing these nasty things, such as disconnecting entire neighborhoods in Tbilisi because they weren’t paying their electric bills. And I’d come back with the footage and show early rough cuts, and everyone hated the Americans for what they were doing.

But as I learned more about the situation and the story developed, I started to realize that the company was genuinely trying to help the Georgians solve their electricity problem. They had very unusual values — “Integrity, Social Responsibility, Fairness and Fun” — and they really seemed to believe in them. So that gave me an opportunity to develop a sort of character arc of Piers and AES, where your perception of them changes over the course of the film. And also maybe deliver a more hopeful message about corporate America than we normally see.

Filmmaker: How did you hook up with Piers Lewis?

Devlin: I knew him from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. When we decided to do the movie, he gave me access. And he turned out to be a great, contradictory character. He’s a progressive, Berkeley-educated, world-traveler, NGO type, but he winds up working for this huge multinational, disconnecting the Georgians from their electricity. And the crazy thing is the Georgians love him because he’s been there seven or eight years, speaks the language and really understands them.


It was actually Piers’s idea to make the movie. He invited me to visit him in Tbilisi and said, “This place is crazy! There are amazing stories here. You’ve got to do a movie about this place.” And I said, “You’re nuts! How am I going to try to tell the story of the epic post-Soviet transition to capitalism? It’s too big.” And he kept encouraging it, and I sent a camera over there, and Valery Odikadze, a Georgian cameraman who eventually became a co-producer, shot some great scenes of workers pulling down illegal power lines. I went over there just expecting to make a fund-raising demo, but there was so much amazing footage that I said, “Okay, I’m hooked. I’ll do it.” That’s when I was able to shoot the disconnections and the street rioting and that kind of stuff.

The challenge was these esoteric topics and this complicated, global, post-Soviet stuff that is sort of difficult to describe just in words, but when you get those kinds of visuals and you see that kind of conflict and the drama that happens when people get disconnected from their electricity, suddenly these local events give you a hook to hang the larger issues. It became clear, for example, how American optimism can be profoundly naive, because a system that works at home will not necessarily work in a foreign culture without first laying a groundwork of education and rule of law. And then we can understand the profound disappointment that independence has been to many post-Soviet states, to the point that some even want to go back to Communism.

Filmmaker: Is AES still there?

Devlin: I’m going to let people buy a ticket to the movie to find that out. I’ll just say that we had to change the end of the film this summer [2003].


Filmmaker: When you were filming riots and stuff, as an identifiable American, did you ever get worried?

Devlin: Sometimes I got worried. A couple times I was asked to stop shooting when I was near the presidential offices. But generally, I didn’t have much trouble. I worked alone with a small Mini DV camera, so I think I was under the radar. But there were a couple of moments. I was shooting at night once, and a car stopped and four big beefy guys got out. I thought, uh-oh, I’m in trouble. But they turned out to be policemen, and they were telling me to get off the street because there had been some tourists who had gotten beaten up in the area recently!

Filmmaker: How did you go about getting funding for this film?

Tycoon: A New Russian: Pavel Lounguine's timely saga from 2003 about the rise to power of a Russian billionaire amid post-Communist chaos.
War and Peace: Anand Patwardhan's epic 2002 documentary examines the escalating militarization of India in its ongoing standoff with Pakistan.
Chronically Unfeasible: Sergio Bianchi's 2000 film skewers race and class relations in a kaleidoscopic portrait of modern-day Brazil.
Devlin: Well, funding for independent documentaries in the U.S. is pretty difficult. I sought funding from the Soros Documentary Fund [now the Sundance International Documentary Fund], the MacArthur Foundation, all the usual suspects, and was rejected out of hand everywhere.

This was a very difficult film to pitch. “So you’re going to do a movie about the Georgian electricity sector. Why would anyone be interested in that?” Once you see Power Trip, you understand why it’s so interesting, but to try to do that on paper is a tough pitch. I made a strong effort with a really good proposal; I actually hired a grant writer, but got nothing. And to try to get private sources for this is also difficult in a market for independent documentaries where it’s very unlikely you’re going to profit.

So if you get no outside funding, at some point you have to make a choice: quit or keep going on your own. I wound up self-financing. And I did that with my last film, SlamNation, as well. I’m hoping that we can break even on Power Trip.

Filmmaker: And what are you doing with it now?

Devlin: Our sales agent and international distributor is Jan Rofekamp with Films Transit International, and he’s doing very well with sales overseas. We’ve sold to the BBC, and I’m told there are over 20 other international sales. In fact, he’s characterized Power Trip as a worldwide best-seller at this point. Europeans get it!

The U.S. market is a little trickier. We were talking to domestic distributors, but not all those deals were great. So we’ve been booking the film ourselves in theaters. We played the Film Forum run in New York in December, and we’re going to be playing in Santa Monica, Pasadena, San Francisco, a few others. With television, if you don’t hit the jackpot with HBO, where there is serious money, the options diminish precipitously after that. The next step is the Sundance Channel, PBS and those kinds of markets, and then you’re talking anywhere from $15,000 to $30,000 if you’re lucky. If you do very, very well, maybe you’re talking $40,000 to $60,000. And this is for a low-budget nonfiction film that is going to cost you anywhere from $100,000 to $200,000 — and that’s with a lot of favors and a lot of in-kind services. If you were to really budget it, it would be more like $350,000 to $400,000. I think with the international TV sales, though, we’re going to do well. And a lot of corporations and financial institutions are contacting us about in-house screenings, which is a nice perk. And if we can find our way into the educational and institutional video market, we’ll be in good shape. Maybe I’ll even break even. But if you’re counting on making money, you’re in the wrong business, because the market for independent documentaries is pretty much unsustainable. Sort of like the electricity market in Georgia.


Filmmaker's curated calendar of the latest video on demand titles.
Free Men Sensation Restless City
See the VOD Calendar →
© 2024 Filmmaker Magazine. All Rights Reserved. A Publication of The Gotham