Saturday, May 23, 2009CANNES SNAPSHOTS: TARANTINO, NOE, HANEKE A lack of wireless, fatigue, and my dislike of netbooks (particularly the kind in the American Pavilion) have curtailed my Cannes posting. I have no idea how Eric Kohn, Matt Dentler, Allison Willmore and the trade reviewers get their well considered reviews up so quickly after their screenings. That said, I'll try to have my thoughts on the handful of films I saw up when I get back to Paris tomorrow. Very quickly, though, Gaspar Noe's Enter the Void is disquieting and dreamy, as much a psychologically charged immersive space as it is a conventional film narrative. Noe's decadent Tokyo riff on the Tibetan Book of the Dead is structured around births, a death, and finds its twists through hypnotic tracking shots, strobe-lit effects and vertiginous clockwheeled pans. The film conceives its own sense of filmic structure, which makes the criticism that it's too long a bit puzzling to me. In that the consciousness of the protagonist becomes largely inaccessible to the viewer in the film's second half, I suppose this section is challenging, but to me that's where its eeriest psychological moments are. I liked it a lot.Inglourious Basterds (did I spell that right) is Quentin Tarantino's most personal-feeling movie, an ambitious meditation on the myth-making abilities of cinema and the responsibilities inherent in being a film director. It is a bit oddly shaped -- here the "too long" critique might be right -- but the film is boldly conceived and audaciously executed. I liked it a lot and am still digesting its heady riffs on '30s and '40s cinema; two friends I was with thought it was Tarantino's best movie. Michael Haneke's The White Ribbon is precisely and perfectly made, an austere portrait of a small German town and some malicious goings-on in the years just prior to World War 1. I found its grimness enervating, however, and was put off by Haneke's stoic refusal to make the film's mysteries either more suspenseful or more mysterious. The targets of Haneke's critique seemed liked straw men to me. And while the single historical event referenced midway through the film gives the film much-needed context, it also plants the suggestion that The White Ribbon might just boil down to being a dramatically questionable take on the seeds of the 20th century German character. I'll flesh out the above in the next few days and also have some thoughts on the festival as a whole and the market this year from the POV of the American independents here. Comments (0) |
OPEN VIDEO CONFERENCE
THE FEST WHERE $100,000 IS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
CANNES: 42 BELOW'S ONE DREAM RUSH FILMS FETED
THE MACARTHUR FOUNDATION BYTES DOWN ON DIGITAL MED...
FREE IS NOT ENOUGH
DIY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF LIST-BUILDING
LIGHT INDUSTRY HOSTS KEVIN JEROME EVERSON
CANNES: MY NEIGHBOR, MY KILLER's ANNE AGHION
CANNES: ANG LEE GETS IT RIGHT
CANNES: REMEMBERING WOUTER
Current Posts
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010