APPLE ANNOUNCES NEW FINAL CUT PRO X AT NAB

By in News
on Tuesday, April 12th, 2011

“Something as revolutionary as the first version of Final Cut Pro when introduced in 1999.” That’s how the new version of Apple’s editing software was announced at the Final Cut Pro User Group Super Meet Up at NAB tonight. The new version of FCP has been hinted at for months, and after several prominent editors were shown a demo — and made to sign NDA’s that apparently only allowed them to leak words like “awesome” — the post production community has been awaiting its official unveiling. Many thought it would appear this summer alongside the release of the new OS, Lion, but days before NAB Apple took over the FCPUG Super Meet Up, booting all scheduled presenters and personalities (including Kevin Smith) for what became the hottest invite at the conference.

So, what’s new in FCP 10? Here are some notes, reactions and a few raves from the event as they’ve streamed invia Twitter. And click here for a excellent first hand report from inside the room by David Leitner.

— a new build, “from the ground up” (This presumably allowed Apple to skip FCP 8 and 9.)
— 64-bit.
— in-built rendering
— you can edit while importing
— Content Auto-Analysis checks for image stabilization, etc. People and shot detection on import as well as automatic non-destructive color balance. (HT: MacRumors)
— “Looks like iMovie/ Smoke type interface and it’s black! No longer white.” — Walter Biscardi
— “My tweet stream is divided into 2 camps: Wooo! the new FCP is like iMovie, & Crap! the new FCP is like iMovie.” — @mikeconaty
— iMovie seems to be harming Apple. If there was no iMovie to compare FCP X to, no one would think it was “iMovie Pro” — @thepeatgroup
— “Apple is really pulling out all the stops with FCP X. 64-bit, OpenCL, linear float processing, background rendering, tons of automation.” — @nicedissolvepro
— “Vastly improved linking. Keeps content & secondary assets together all the time. Magnetic timeline prevents you from colliding clips.” @dbax
— “Inline precision editor”: makes standard edits (roll, ripple, slip) easier by dynamically expanding to reveal all source media ala iOS (@fcpsupermeet)
— smart collection of clips and audio based on metadata and people in shot. (Engadget)
— Clip Connections: Audio and Video and be locked together and be one clip on a timeline (no longer a V1 and A1 A2 track). Can lock audio clips with specific video clip, so if moved on timeline they stay synched (via @reximilian via MacRumors)
— #FCP-seem to be repackaging a lot of current features with some sugar added. Huge workflow changes. Huge. — @cgyfcpug
— “CP X is going to change my life. Organization, background processing/analysis… “your timeline is no longer fragile.” — @kierafaye
— “FCP X has built-in tools making editing b-roll easier. Dubbbed “Second Stories.” Gotta love Apple’s branding for this kind of stuff.” — Macgasm
— one-click color matching between clips
— “Color ranging allows for primary and secondary color correction adjustments in a very clean implementation.” @silveradosys
— “New #FCP: No rendering + No transcoding = Less storage space needed = cash in pocket” — @storymixpro
— “Fade handles right in the timeline, including right-clicking to choose type of fade — no more keyframe dots. Similarly, audio editing handles based on selections right in the timeline — and the audio waveform moves up and down to reflect the changes.” (No Film School)

UPDATE: This morning, Craig Bergonzoni forwarded me these thoughts on the event:

The demo of FCP X amazed me in many aspects and had me craving to see more.

As soon as the slide came up with a picture of the interface you heard many reactions, like “See, it’s iMovie pro.” Assuming iMovie pro is a bad thing then many of the crowd were set up for disappointment from the beginning.

Let’s forget the name of the app and the company who makes it for a moment. The post-production app I saw demoed a few hours ago excited me like no other in recent memory. In post-production one of the main goals is to worry about the art and have the software all but disappear. This fluidity usually occurs when the editor knows his system inside and out. FCP X seems completely designed with that standard in mind. How can we make this software get out of our way at every chance?

Footage importing, logging, and organizing are actions completely rethought. The features in those areas are vast and impressive, but the timeline, or editing area, is what dropped my jaw. What we used to call a timeline feels more like a clean canvas for editing masterpieces. It starts with no visual tracks. Tracks appear and disappear as needed. Audio tracks move up or down when another audio track threatens its space. Audio stays in sync much easier now, even secondary audio or music. The timeline is smart. It becomes a participant in your edit. Almost all of the amazing moments I saw last night were related to the new editing tools in the timeline.

I have more questions about FCP X & the other FCS apps than I can write down. Apple is making some daring moves with this release that no other company has the gall to try. Apple is once again leading the industry and raising the bar with what we should except from an NLE.

Final Cut Pro X will be available in June from the App Store… for the surprisingly low price of $299.

And one more: “Sure, the new #FCP software is great, but with a price tag of $299, where do we draw the line between consumer and professional software?” (@christopherself)

You can follow any follow up comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

  • Pingback: Final Cut Pro X: features list | Canon 5D tips

  • http://twitter.com/krisht Chris Patmore

    What’s going to happen to Final Cut Express, which bridged the iMovie – FCP gap of price and features?

    • http://www.filmmakermagazine.com Scott Macaulay

      From what I understand — and from what David says in the podcast linked here — FCP Express is no more. I think it’s just iMovie and FCP from now on.

      • Chatra3

        For $299.00 – that would make sense.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1153405320 Timothy Peters

        That’s terrific since I just spent $200 on the horrible FCE last week. I agree with Nigelkellaway in that I really have to fight with FCE and spend hours trying to fix little things. It makes it really difficult to see the “film” in the footage. Too much time is spent trying to do the same things that iMovie can do with a few simple mouse clicks. iMovie has really terrible control over audio. Still I would trade wrestling with the audio in iMovie over the constant battles I have with FCE.

  • Nigelkellaway

    Some thoughts on FCP – I’ve been supporting some filmmakers new to editing and to say what we currently have is great would be totally wrong – the software has been slowly taking over – we’ve lost the simplicity of editing of having all your footage around you and being able to put it together quickly and explore and find the film in amongst the footage – it has become so finicky – if some of the simplicity comes back that would be great – I had a go in an apple shop of iMovie on an iPad – it wasn’t great – not accurate enough but what I loved was being able to slide back and forth through the timeline with my finger this felt like I was in touch with my film (two bad shots from the iPad camera of the apple store) one of the things I loved about editing super 8 and 16mm. Video editing never had any joy about it – except when the equipment took up a room so it gave you space to think and pace around whilst the machines spun up and got their heads together – let’s hope FCP X brings some simplicity back – as for price – come on they are doing what InDesign did to Quark

  • Chatra3

    Consumer or professional software? Why do we need to draw a line? Do the professionals feel superior? Editing is editing. The only difference in the past is how fast and stable an editor would perform. Apple is giving a power product to high end editors, yet affordable for low budget enthusiast. To classify yourself as a professional because you use more expensive software is downright dumb. The playing field is now open for all. If Avid were smart they would offer their top of the line editing software for $299.00 to all. When you hit the masses, you make the profit. When you hit the masses with high end professional software that outperforms all professional and broadcast software for $299.00, you become the God of editors.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t really have an issue with the fanboy iMovie comparisons, because honestly when I saw the first demos of the rebuilt iMovie I thought it was far more complex than what was necessary for a consumer editing app, so of course I starting thinking that that was where the FCP development was headed. All the chatter is likely coming from people that have decided to hate Apple because of their success and not for any legitimate reasons.

    I like a lot of things I’ve seen, but the lack of a viewer window and the tried and a true 3-point editing procedure along with that, if that’s where FCP X is heading, is a game breaker. I remember using the earliest versions of Premiere in film school and having only timeline based editing back in the 90′s. I loved that application as a learning tool for beginning student filmmakers trying to just slap stuff together while I hated the 3-point linear editing process UNTIL I worked with it for a bit on Avid. 3-Point editing is just more precise then dragging, dropping and sliding clips from a bin to a timeline as far as always getting you cuts and timing correct the first time. Editing often times is so much about rhythm. There’s also the immensely satisfying feeling of really seeing the film build linearly and become real in that final edit window. I’ll have to wait and see what editing cut to cut in the timeline is like, but I really liked the idea of blending the two approaches (timeline/3-point editing) which the original FCP managed pretty effectively. The only thing I can add here is that Final Cut has a history of having a pretty malleable interface and I certainly hope that that will still be true after the update and.

    Hopefully FCP X will allow editors to work in whatever way they wish to, otherwise it could prove to be a quick detractor for a lot of Final Cut users that have no other wish than to continue using FCP.

  • Pingback: Quora

  • Pingback: NAB 1: Final Cut Pro X – rethinking the editing paradigm | Nino Film - Blog - Nino Leitner - DSLR video, filmmaking & more

  • http://www.24hrlocksmithsleeds.co.uk Ben the Locksmith in Leeds

    Isnt this just like a new version of imovie?

VOD CALENDAR

Filmmaker's curated calendar of the latest video on demand titles.
All In: The Poker Movie A NY Thing #Regeneration
See the VOD Calendar →
Filmmaker's Best Of 2011

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Filmmaker Magazine is powered by WordPress.org.